13: “Humans might one day need to beg AIs for our sentient rights” – AI expert Roman Yampolskiy – Sentientist Conversations

We discuss the biggest questions: "what's real?", "who matters?" and "how to make a better world?" with scientists, celebrities, activists, writers and philosophers. The Sentientism worldview is "evidence, reason and compassion for all sentient beings." It's a simple, yet radical, philosophy that's grounded in reality (naturalistic epistemology) and has compassion for all sentient beings (mostly human and non-human animals). Naturalism & sentiocentrism combined.

SUBSCRIBE: Apple Podcast | Website | Spotify | RSS

Full show notes & links here.

Roman is a Professor of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Louisville. He is known for his work on behavioral biometrics, the security of cyberworlds & artificial intelligence safety. He founded the field of intellectology – the analysis of the forms & limits of intelligence. He is director of the Cyber Security Laboratory in the department of Computer Engineering &Computer Science at the Speed School of Engineering. Roman has written over 100 publications, including many books spanning these fields.

In these Sentientist Conversations, we talk about the two most important questions: “what’s real?” & “what matters?”

To catch the cameo from Luna the puppy (“seems conscious”) watch the video of our conversation here. Don’t forget to subscribe to our channel while you’re there.

We discuss:

• Growing up in the Soviet Union. Not much religion around.
• Not meeting anyone religious until coming to the US as an adult
• Not finding religious arguments interesting or compelling
• Fascination with intersection of big ideas, philosophy, science
• Questions can come from religion, but standards of evidence come from science
• Comfort with others holding supernatural beliefs – helps us remain open-minded
• Is god analogous with someone running a world simulation?
• We need to get better at evaluating evidence. Should be separate from theories/hypotheses
• The need for scientific humility
• Deep fakes
• Freedom as an ethical foundation, subject to not hurting others or restricting the freedom of others
• Can we develop a pop-up AI that guides our ethics?
• Consciousness / sentience warrants protection
• Can Artificial Intelligences achieve consciousness or even super-consciousness?
• Humans might need to beg future AIs for our rights, as we grant rights to animals
• The hypocrisy of thinking animals should have rights, but enjoying eating them (theory vs. practice & cognitive dissonance)
• Why so many AI researchers are ready to acknowledge AI sentience but forget or disregard non-human animal sentience
• Consciousness, sentience, qualia, the “Hard Problem”, David Chalmers
• Assessing sentience
• The role of observers in quantum physics. Could there be some non-material element of consciousness?
• Meeting Luna the puppy “Seems conscious!”
• Will future AIs warrant protection/rights
• Ending animal farming to set a good example to our future AI overlords
• AIs will prefer “sentientism” to “humanism”
• Substrate independence
• Sentience/consciousness as a spectrum, simple to super (beyond human)
• Ethical challenges with non-sentient AI
• If human agents can’t agree (value alignment problem), can we even move towards a shared environment that will make us all happy? Maybe everyone could have their own individual virtual world!
• Even a positively negotiated shared environment wouldn’t be as good for each of us as a perfect individual environment – just don’t switch it off
• Can animal farming go away in a few years via clean-meat etc?
• Veganism and moral resolutions to cognitive dissonance, vs. tech alternatives removing blockers
• The dangers of disenfranchising humans if we grant rights too broadly (e.g. to trillions of bacteria or sentient AIs)
• Equal vs. degrees of moral consideration
• “Most of us will be as ethical as our choices”.